Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah, on Wednesday afternoon, October 22, in a meeting with a group of intellectuals and political, social, and cultural activists from East Azerbaijan Province, referred to the historical significance of Tabriz in Iran's political and social developments and said: Speaking about Tabriz in the presence of political, cultural, and social activists is difficult because this city is the cradle of politics, culture, and a vibrant and living society.
The Historical Role of Tabriz in Revolutions
Ghaempanah added: Tabriz has played a prominent role in the formation of two major transformations in contemporary Iranian history, namely the Constitutional Revolution and the Islamic Revolution. During the Constitutional Revolution, the associations formed in Tabriz played a role in guiding the struggles, and the steadfastness of the people of this city during the siege and the bravery of Sattar Khan and Bagher Khan is a lasting part of Iran's history.
He also referred to the epic of Bahman 29, 1356 in Tabriz and considered this event a turning point in the Islamic Revolution, stating: The uprising of the people of Tabriz on Bahman 29 had a significant impact on the continuation and expansion of the Islamic Revolution. The people of this city have played a role with courage and steadfastness at various historical moments.
The Dichotomy of War and Negotiation
The Executive Vice President referred to some disagreements regarding how to confront the country's international conditions and said: One of the dichotomies that arises in society is the dichotomy of war and negotiation. He emphasized that the main issue is how to make appropriate decisions while preserving the dignity and national interests of Iran.
Ghaempanah pointed out that some emphasize continuing the war without negotiation, while others have views about accepting the demands of the opposing side, clarifying: The country's decisions must be made within the framework of legal mechanisms and with consideration of national interests. He also referred to the position of the Supreme National Security Council in the country's major decision-making and said: The resolutions of this council are pursued within the framework of legal arrangements and established approvals.
Ghaempanah emphasized that defensive and diplomatic capabilities can coexist, stating: If the enemy seeks to impose its demands, the country will defend itself, and negotiation can also be pursued within the framework of the system's decisions and to secure national interests.
