Tensions in the artificial intelligence (AI) industry are rising, and leaders in the field disagree on how to regulate the technology. Four days after OpenAI, Anthropic, and Elon Musk called for slowing down AI advancements, a group of industry leaders and lawmakers at the Decoded Summit conference reached no agreement on how to regulate this technology, although most agreed that this responsibility should be assigned to an individual or entity.
Disagreement Over AI Oversight
Sarah Huck, head of policy at Anthropic, refrained from supporting the independent oversight plan for AI that OpenAI had backed the day before. Democratic Representative Greg Casar from Texas called for mandatory limits on the technology and the creation of a federal agency to regulate it. On the other hand, Britt Guthrie, chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, emphasized that speed is less important than the correctness of policies, and in the meantime, two individuals disagreed on whether Americans should be concerned about Chinese competitors.
Concerns and Criticisms Surrounding AI
David Sachs, former head of AI and cryptography at the White House, called for maintaining U.S. superiority over China and introduced a media campaign as a factor creating concern among lawmakers regarding AI. He referenced Donald Trump's approach to addressing these concerns, stating that he has a unique ability to clarify issues regarding AI. Trump, in a message on the social media platform Truth Social, referred to concerns about AI as a "hoax" and downplayed any immediate hopes for new regulations.
The tech industry has realized that the growing opposition among Americans to data centers and concerns about the economic transformation caused by AI could influence political discussions. Despite years of requests to Congress for a mild regulatory approach, leading companies in the field are renewing their public commitments to ensure the safety of their models.
Currently, at the center of congressional discussions is the FRONTIER plan introduced by Representatives Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan, aimed at establishing a federal framework for AI safety. The future of this plan remains uncertain. On Tuesday, Chris Lehan, chief lobbyist for OpenAI, supported a key provision of the plan that would require large AI companies to cooperate with independent safety evaluators. However, Sarah Huck from Anthropic refrained from endorsing these provisions at the conference.
Casar also called for a halt to the development of advanced AI and a permanent ban on "superintelligence." Coleman DeLang, CEO of Hugging Face, whose company was the target of an unprecedented cyberattack by AI actors, stated at the conference that strict accountability laws could incentivize AI companies to focus more on cybersecurity.
Disagreements in Congress do not mean that ideas are lacking. However, the inability to converge on legal solutions for regulating AI could lead to significant missed opportunities for leaders in both parties. This issue could be particularly dangerous as emerging technology becomes a major concern for voters. Democrats are calling for swift congressional action, even if they are not exactly sure how.
More than 100 Democrats have urged Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, to keep the House in session until bipartisan AI legislation is passed. However, he reduced the time lawmakers would spend in Washington and sent them home a day early. Many Republicans, who control both chambers, have not shown the same urgency for action on AI. Guthrie on Wednesday refrained from scheduling a vote on a bipartisan proposal to impose limits on AI, stating that this action could even be delayed until next year.
Read more: The Pentagon continues to develop artificial intelligence · Senator Tom Tills rejected Trump's claim about the threat of artificial intelligence
